Crisis is brewing among port terminal operators over an allegation that one of them has been favoured by the Nigeria Customs Service to corner a larger percentage of imported vehicles coming through Lagos ports for clearing.
The aggrieved terminal operators and shippers who spoke with our correspondent on Friday claimed to have lost over 30 per cent of their vehicle cargo to the ‘favoured operator’ in the last one year.
They backed up their claim with valuation assessment forms obtained from the Customs by importers/shippers on some imported vehicles, which were cleared at different terminals in Lagos.
The Federal Government, through the Bureau of Public Enterprises, in 2006 awarded the management of port terminals to10 private operators as part of its reform programme aimed at improving the operating environment and shoring up government’s revenue from the sector.
The Customs is expected to have a template for assessing all cargoes coming into the country to enable it to issue a uniform surface duty on identical product for clearing at any of the terminals.
But some shipping companies and terminal operators have questioned the template being used by the NSC for the valuation.
They said the subsisting arrangement, allegedly skewed in favour of a particular terminal operator (name withheld), was a major threat to their business.
A shipper, Mrs. Olaide Adebisi, for instance, said she had lost eight out of 20 vehicle importing customers in less than one year because her rate was found to be higher than what was being charged.
Another shipper, Mr. Mike Okonji, said, “How can the Customs charge N250,000 on a vehicle and slam N450,000 on the similar vehicle coming from a different terminal in Lagos?”
He complained that the favoured operator had used the reduced rate to lure many importers to use its facility.
Some Customs valuation documents obtained by our correspondents on Friday also showed discrepancies in the rates.
For instance, a valuation assessment form issued on March 23, 2012 in respect of a Toyota Corolla 2010 model put the Customs duty rate at N400,000 on the vehicle whose estimated cost in dollar was $13,334.
Another vehicle, Toyota Camry 2009, cleared from the favoured terminal on April 05, 2012, got a N200,000 Customs duty rate with $666 as the dollar value of the car.
A manager in one of the terminals said, “The Camry should have cost higher than the Corolla, notwithstanding the one year difference; imagine the difference of N200,000; something must be done about this.
“I think it is under-valued, a deliberate act to deny the government of its expected revenue.”
But investigation by our correspondent showed that a vehicle duty rate was usually calculated based on the estimated cost of the vehicle.
The valuation for Camry, for instance, came to N200,000, as 20 per cent of the value of the car ($666) at N150 rate of exchange.
For the Corolla, it was also 20 per cent of $$13,334 using the same exchange rate.
A car dealer, Mr. Adekola Abiola, said the Corolla could be acceptable at N2m form Europe, but doubted if N99,900, could buy the Camry as presented in the assessment.
The NCS has denied any deal with a terminal operator to bring down its duty value.
The NCS Public Relations Officer, Tincan Island, Apapa, Mr. Christian Osugwo, said, “There is no iota of truth in the allegation. We have a harmonized database for Customs value on vehicles in all Customs commands. The Customs management is doing its best to have a level playing field for all operators.”
He said the operators had requested for a benchmark, which was granted and later modified as agreed by all players, adding that none of them had any reason to complain.
The Nigerian Ports Authority, in its reaction, said the matter had not been officially reported to the authority.
The General Manager, Public Affairs, Nigerian Ports Authority, Chief Michael Ajayi, said, it welcomed a healthy competition among the terminal operators, but stressed that the concession was meant to free the market and was never done in favour of any player.
The 10 concessionaires were given between 10 and 25 years to manage the port terminals.